|
WHO ARE THE MEDIA?
WHO DO
THEY WORK FOR?
WHAT IS THEIR PURPOSE?
The Hegelian
Dialectic
Have You No Sense of Decency Left?
If the
corporate media had been as diligent about watchdogging
President Bush as they have been about watchdogging
Reverend Wright, it's very likely we wouldn't have
invaded Iraq.
If the
corporate media had spent as much time exposing the
obvious flaws and grotesque inequalities of Reaganomics
throughout the last 30 years as they've spent on Wright,
we wouldn't necessarily be staring into the maw of
another depression.
If the
corporate media were as diligent about debunking the
lies surrounding Iran's so-called nuclear program as
they've been about Wright, there wouldn't be such a
sense of inevitability in terms of attacking -- or
entirely obliterating -- Iran.
So what
is the very serious corporate media, the only industry
that is explicitly protected by the Constitution, doing
to remedy their failures of the recent past? Rather than
watchdogging the Bush administration and Senator McCain
on Iraq, Iran, the economy and all the rest of it --
areas in which Senator McCain is laughably wrong and
dangerously inconsistent -- what are we seeing instead?
All
three major cable news networks are wasting valuable air
time on Senator Obama's former pastor. Why? Is the story
newsworthy? Sure. Is wall-to-wall Wright coverage more
important than Iraq or gas prices or the climate crisis?
No way. But Reverend Wright is a scary, shouting black
man and scary shouting black men equal
ratings-sweet-ratings.
We
expect to see this sort of race-baiting
behavior from Fox News Channel, but CNN and MSNBC
have, once again, similarly crossed the tabloid
threshold into the very same nefarious Roger Ailes realm
by beating this nothing story to death.
MSNBC,
for example, continues to invite Pat Buchanan onto their
air -- a known race-baiter and author of a
recent article in
which he claims that, despite 300 years of slavery,
America has been the best nation ever for black people
(food stamps, for example). The article, by the way,
totally ignores the reality that, had it not been for
slavery and Jim Crow laws, Africans could very easily
have immigrated to America as free people and enjoyed
the benefits of our constitutional liberties; but the
article also lords welfare and food stamps over the
heads of African Americans -- as if Buchanan ever once
supported such measures in the first place.
Yet
Buchanan gets thawed out of his cryo-freeze chamber
every time there's some race-baiting to be done. Of the
thousands of Republicans at their disposal as a means of
balancing out the brilliant Rachel and the equally
brilliant Keith, MSNBC chooses the one Republican who's
known as much for his racism as he is for his high pitch
voice. This leads me to believe that MSNBC is knowingly
stoking the racial fires of the Wright story, simply
because they continue to invite Buchanan to speak for
the angry white men who think they're God's gift to
black people (food stamps, for example).
The
reality is that only one of the candidates is being
attacked for their connections when, in fact, all three
candidates have controversial and embarrassing
relationships. The difference, as near as I can tell, is
that only one candidate has an angry, shouting black connection.
And -- bonus! --
there's videotape of this angry, shouting black man
suggesting that America is partly to blame for the
attacks of September 11!
Wait,
wait. That claim sounds familiar. Who else besides, you
know, the 9/11 Commission has claimed that American
foreign policy in the Middle East was partly to blame
for the September 11 attacks? In other words, who else
has basically said -- and repeatedly so -- that America's
"chickens have come home to roost"?
That'd
be Republican Congressman Ron Paul. So let's see here...
Which Republicans must, by their own standards, be held
accountable for their relationship with such an obvious
America-hater? Who ought to be forced to repeatedly
renounce and reject Congressman Paul?
"I think
it's all up for grabs, and I don't think that anyone's
emerging. I think these people who are racing to declare
anyone the true frontrunner at this point -- I just
don't see it. Although I am partial to Ron Paul..." --Laura
Ingraham
"That's
music to my ears, Laura." --Tucker
Carlson responding
to Ingraham's praise.
"I like
him personally, I know him personally... I will say that
he is also the one candidate that everybody knows who
fought against big government. He voted against unsure
Medicare, the prescription drugs, and No Child Left
Behind. He's consistent, he's courageous." --Pat
Buchanan
"Ron
Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a
stronger national defense. As a former Air Force
officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces,
and he always puts them first. We need to keep him
fighting for our country." --Ronald
Reagan
"[Ron
Paul] is the only candidate out there that's talking
like a lot of us talked in 94. And that's what a lot of
Americans want but no one will say anything anymore...I
bet he's gonna shock a lot of people in New Hampshire."
--Joe
Scarborough
"He's a
very engaging person... I'd like to see him as
president."
"I think
I'm fondest of Ron Paul... He's the only person I agree
with on foreign policy."
"Rep.
Ron Paul (Tex.) continues to amaze on many levels, and
he had finally started to register on the polls. In last
Tuesday's Midwestern ice storm, almost every Iowa event
was cancelled. The exception was a Paul rally, which
drew hundreds. His crowds are regularly huge and
enthusiastic. He chalked up another record fundraising
day on Sunday's anniversary of the Boston Tea Party,
with more than $6 million in online donations in a
single day." --Bob
Novak
"The
most honest man in Congress." --Senator
John McCain
With the
exception of President Reagan of course, I expect all of
these Republicans politicians and pundits will step
forward and declare their intentions to sever all ties
to Congressman Paul, and to subsequently retract all
praise for the Congressman.
How
about it, Joe Scarborough? Does Ron Paul really talk
like you used to talk? And would you, Pat Buchanan,
define blaming America for September 11 as "courageous."
And do you still support Ron Paul, Tucker? If Ron Paul
is the most honest man in Congress, Senator McCain, does
that mean he's telling the truth about September 11?
Naturally, the difference here is that Congressman Paul
is a white Republican, and Reverend Wright is a crazy
shouting black pastor. Many (too many) white Americans
fear angry black people, even though, given the
historical record, we all ought to fear old, white,
powerful Republicans a little more than we do right now.
What
about other white Republicans who have said equally
crazy things? Pastor Hagee, who has endorsed Senator
McCain, just recently claimed that God
"damned" New Orleans. Add that statement to the
anti-Semitic statements and the anti-Catholic statements
and you've got yourself a controversy. But are the cable
networks cutting to live coverage of Pastor Hagee for
two hours at a stretch? Are ABC and Fox News going to
question Senator McCain about his relationship with
Hagee -- the same questions over and over again, backed
with the same footage over and over again? Of course
not.
In
addition to Hagee's awful remarks about New Orleans, the
networks, by-in-large, skimmed past the news that this
month has been the deadliest month in Iraq since
September 2007. The networks continue to ignore the root
causes of the current recession and Senator McCain's
promise to continue the Reaganomics of the current
administration. The networks all but ignored Senator
Clinton's promise to "obliterate" Iran with nuclear
weapons, even though hundreds of thousands of Iranian
people, who held pro-American vigils after September 11,
favor government reforms and disapprove of Ahmadinejad.
So I
have to ask the appropriate network executives the
familiar yet appropriate question: Have
you no sense of decency at long last? Have you left no
sense of decency?
The
constant, around-the-clock coverage has become a
race-baiting spectacle far beyond the realms of
journalistic decency, honor and integrity, especially
given the slag heap through which most Americans are
marching right now -- a march which truly deserves
wall-to-wall news coverage. And if the cable news
networks can't help but to prioritize their headlines
with the same twisted fury as far-right talk show hosts
or racist Republican strategists like Floyd
Brown or Alex
Castellanos, it's clear that the answer to that
famous question is a resounding "nope."
http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2008/04/30/have-you-left-no-sense-of-decency/
FOX FINALLY
GOT OUTFOXED-:)
You have got to see this video.
The professor "smacked" fox
dead in their mouths and shut them up! It was the best
thing I have ever seen. And the Professor got his
message out - that 9/11
WAS AN INSIDE JOB right
on the LYING
FOX TV.
If I never see another thing on
FOX, I will FOREVER remember the professor. That
incident was the funniest thing I could have imagined. Hehehehehehehehahahahahaha...... how
good it feels to laugh at FOX :).
Now if you NEVER hear another TV
news channel say 9/11 was an inside job, you can say you
heard it"FIRST ON FOX"!
That's why the corporate media,
owned by the Bushmen, don't want Obama to be elected
because he will investigate the information the Bush
ass-kissers won't. And once the evidence is proven to be
correct, we can see Bush/Cheney and all their Bushmen go
straight to jail without passing "Go". That will be
worth the eight years of torture we've had to face with
that fascist regime.
The Corporate Structure of
The Mass Media
http://www.mediamonitors.net/mosaddeq32.html
by Nafeez Mosaddeq
Ahmed
It was Walter Lippman who
coined the phrase “the manufacture of consent”,
enjoining it as a means of population control. Lippman’s
concept may indeed be in effect today. In this regard,
the status of the mass media and its faithful
propagation of the established opinion that Western
policy is fundamentally benevolent in intention, is an
issue of paramount importance. What role has the media
played in clarifying the real principles and motives of
Western policy to the public, and what does this entail
for the nature of Western democracy and the role of the
population in the formulation of policy? The mass media
is clearly one of the most powerful institutions in
society; it is, for most of the public, the ultimate
source of all their information. The structure of the
mass media will therefore have fundamental implications
for the political and cultural orientation of the
public. Hence, an understanding of the mass media will
throw considerable light on the structure of Western
society, the relationship between the public and those
who possess power, as well as the ideologies produced by
the media and their impact on the public. All scholars
generally agree that the media do have the capacity to
set the agenda of public discourse about political
affairs, and it is widely recognised that the media has
a significant role in actualizing the diffusion of
Western ideology and culture throughout the world.
However, they differ over the degree to which the media
limits the public’s understanding of current affairs and
the overall consequences of this.
Nevertheless, the vast extent
of the manipulation of the media under the sway of
business interests has been harshly revealed in the
statement of John Swainton, Chief of Staff of the New
York Times. “There is not one of you who would dare
to write his honest opinion,” he reprimanded his
colleagues at his retirement party in September.
“The business of a
journalist now is to destroy the truth, to lie outright,
to pervert, to vilify, fall at the feet of Mammon and
sell himself for his daily bread. We are tools, vessels
of rich men behind the scenes, we are jumping jacks.
They pull the strings; we dance. Our talents, our
possibilities and our lives are the properties of these
men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”
Read the
stories that TV news networks forget to report!

Cartoon by K. Bendib, all
rights reserved.
Donate and receive Bendib’s
1st book of 152 cartoons here!
"Our citizens may be deceived
for awhile, and have been deceived; but as long as the
presses can be protected, we may trust to them for
light." -Thomas Jefferson, 1779
AP president proposes
media lobby to fight government secrecy -
Denouncing increased official secrecy, Associated
Press President and CEO Tom Curley unveiled a plan
Friday for a media advocacy center to lobby in
Washington for open government. - "The powerful have
to be watched, and we are the watchers," Curley
said, "and you don't need to have your notebook
snatched by a policeman to know that keeping an eye
on government activities has lately gotten a lot
harder." - At
every level of government, records are being sealed
and requests for information denied, and courts are
imposing gag orders and sealing documents,
Curley said, speaking in the Hays Press-Enterprise
Lecture series. - "The point I want to make with
these brief examples is an elemental one: The
government's power is overwhelming. Its agents are
armed and authorized to use force if they have to,"
Curley said. - "News is our business. We are the
watchers," Curley said. "Open government is the
personal interest and constitutional right of every
citizen. But we of the fourth estate have by far the
greatest means and incentive to speak and fight for
it." - TVNL Comment: BRAVO! Simply BRAVO!
Under Bush, a New Age of
Prepackaged Television News -
To a viewer, each report looked like any other
90-second segment on the local news. In fact, the
federal government produced all three. - Several
major television networks play crucial intermediary
roles in the business. Fox, for example, has an
arrangement with Medialink to distribute video news
releases to 130 affiliates through its video feed
service, Fox News Edge. CNN distributes releases to
750 stations in the United States and Canada through
a similar feed service, CNN Newsource. Associated
Press Television News does the same thing worldwide
with its Global Video Wire. - Under the Bush
administration, federal agencies appear to be
producing more releases, and on a broader array of
topics. - United States law contains provisions
intended to prevent the domestic dissemination ofgovernment
propaganda.
IMAGINE ALL THE PEOPLE WHO
MIGHT STILL BE ALIVE -
HAD THE CORPORATE MEDIA NOT BETRAYED THEM!
-
DEMOCRACY REDEFINED! -
A TvNewsLIES.org ANALYSIS OF MANTRA MANIPULATION BY
G. W. BUSH AND THE MEDIA
-
-
US Media; Traitors of
Humanity
-
The Press and Freedom,
Some Disturbing Trends
-
TvNewsLies.org Tracks Iraq
Invasion Coverage
-
Protecting Bush
- Wave the Flag or be
Silenced - Article expired.
-
No questions asked
-
The Fourhorsemen of
Propaganda
-
Bush's Top Gun Photo-Op
-
“Journalism profession in
somewhat of a paralysis”
-
Intimidation Punditry - a
Disservice
-
Freedoms crumble, press
sleeps
-
Introspective Media Not in
the Cards
-
Just Another Week for The
Bush Administration and the U.S. Media
-
Toe-the-Line Media
-
The China Syndrome -
‘ U.S. government's ability to reward media
companies that do what it wants’
-
Ed Garvey: Mainstream
media still treating Bush with kid gloves
-
Keepers of Bush Image Lift
Stagecraft to New Heights -
using the powers of television and technology to
promote a presidency like never before.
-
Bush's TV image is remote
from reality
-
Bush unchallenged by media
-
-
Hawks turned media
into parrots -
ANTONIA ZERBISIAS - Turns out that CNN was the
Pentagon's Bitch after all. - But, in fairness
to America's "most trusted'' news source, my
indelicate term can also be applied to ABC World
News Tonight, CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly
News, Fox's Special Report with Brit Hume and,
yes, even unto PBS's NewsHour With Jim Lehrer.
-
Handout Photos Don't
Tell the Whole Story -
The wire services -- behaving like adjuncts of
the White House -- distributed the staged
hospital scenes, and noted in their captions
that the photos were handouts.
-
U.S. media caved in to
the Bush agenda -
‘I scanned the major U.S. networks for voices
challenging the distortions and bunkum coming
from the White House and neo-cons. There was
virtually none.‘
-
U.S. media criticism
of Bush too soft -
The media critic for the Washington Post, Howard
Kurtz, recently returned from London, where he
was blown away by the harshness of the coverage
of British Prime Minister Tony Blair. - "George
W. Bush bloody well has it easy," Kurtz wrote.
"He doesn't have to put up with the hour-by-hour
pounding that the British press gives Tony
Blair, with journalists calling him a liar and
worse in a raging debate over whether Iraq
really had weapons of mass destruction."
-
We ask the questions -
It took a British journalist to put the American
Defence Secretary on the spot. Why, asks Justin
Webb, are the US media so timorous?
-
Bring Back the
Skeptical Press -
The Bush administration has been taking heavy
flak for its as yet unproved claims about Saddam
Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. In fixing
blame for the way the public appears to have
been sold a bill of goods, don't overlook the
part played by the media. Instead of closely
questioning the administration's case, the
nation's newspaper editorialists basically
nodded in agreement.
-
Media Weapon in 'War
on Terror' -
‘Pakistani press is freer in its coverage of
foreign policy issues than the American media.'
Recent events, particularly in the aftermath of
the Iraq War, seem to corroborate Fisk critical
perspective on the American
media view
of the 'war on terror', since it has almost become
a partner of the Pentagon in promoting and
projecting the officially-certified truth, even
at the cost of its credibility and professional
ethics.
-
-
THE NEW AMERICAN ORDER -
From here, from Paris and from other capitals,
it appears that the
administration of George W. Bush is operating
only in its own reality. And sometimes the
American press seems to be doing the same thing.
British and French correspondents are "dissing"
theAmerican
press as just another branch of the U.S.
government. -
TVNL comment: Pay attention to this one folks.
Have you ever been in a relationship where
everyone around you sees that the person you are
with is no good for you, but you don’t see it?
You ignore them and you tell them that they do
not understand your partner. Then after years of
abuse you finally break it off only to realize
that your friends were right all along only it
is too late to prevent all the damage done. Well
America, we better start listening to our
friends!
-
AP silently strikes
line about anti-Bush protestors - “Many held
signs protesting the Bush administration's
foreign policy.” - However, the emphasized
sentence has been stricken from most of the
other versions around the web.
-
News media abandon
historic role -- and public suffers -
Millions of Americans accept what they are told
and think they understand what they see. And
what they are told and what they see is most
often news as a manipulated commodity. But the
facts that really count rarely reach a
significant number of the public's ears or
eyes. - Also, most reporters know
governments lie, mislead and deceive. They also
know that the press
is ostensibly there to keep an eye on
governments, to dissect errors and omissions by
offering more truthful counter-narratives.
-
-
What the Hell is going
on with CBS?! -
WHO is LYING? What the hell is going on at CBS?
This looks like a disinformation campaign. Who
got to them? Lawyers? The CIA? The Bush
Cartel/Rove Machine?
-
Frustrated Democrats
complain of media bias -
Democrats in Congress claim the mainstream print
and broadcast media are giving the Bush
administration and Republican leaders on the
Hill a free ride. - These lawmakers complain
that the
press holds President Bush to a much lower
standard of accountability than it did President
Clinton. Bush’s
predecessor weathered such media firestorms as
Whitewater, Travelgate, and Monica Lewinsky
-
The press gives Bush a
free ride on his lies -
I’M GLAD THAT the press is finally making an
issue of President Bush's knowing use of a faked
intelligence report on Iraq's supposed nuclear
weapons program. But most of the press keeps
missing the behind or who actually benefits from
the tax cuts or what kind of drug coverage the
administration's Medicare amendments will really
provide or how the Bush Clear Skies Act actually
degrades clean-air standards, the press has
given the administration an astonishingly free
ride.
-
No Question: The Media
Is Right -
It used to be big news when leaders were
dishonest. The media forced politicians of both
parties to pay a price for even the slightest
infraction. Just ask Al Gore, who was tarred and
feathered for a few careless comments about the
Internet. That has changed. The media now barely
flinches when the truth is distorted. In just a
few years, the same media that tenaciously
attacked the last White House over the tiniest
appearance of impropriety now barely reports
when the current White House deceives, hides
information and knowingly ignores hard facts.
-
-
Parallel Universes -
If British newspaper readers learned anything of
Blair's rapturous reception here last week, they
learned it from British articles denouncing the
slavish U.S. media. If French television viewers
learned anything about American perceptions of
the war in Iraq, they learned it from French
news items on the jingoistic U.S. media.
-
A Pattern Of Deception -
Duping The Nation - Bush's statement on Iraq
shows his telltale MO. Moreover, duping the
nation into war is only one case of the pattern
of calculated deception that has gone on since
the outset of his administration. - Using
Propaganda - A hard truth appears to have
escaped the notice of the public and received scant
attention from the media: Bush
is the first president in American history to
use deceptive propaganda as his main means of
communications in selling his policies. His
pattern of deception continues unabated and in
direct conflict with the notion of the public's
informed consent that is central to American
democracy.
-
U.S. Media Are Too
Soft on the White House -
One of the main problems with American reporting
has been reflexive deference toward pivotal
administration players like Donald Rumsfeld,
Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice. Chronic
overreliance on official sources worsened for a
long time after 9/11, with journalists
failing to scrutinize contradictions, false
statements and leaps of illogic.
-
-
The Cheshire Story -
And after the American media was done, nothing
was left but a grin. - Back almost a year ago,
there was a huge flap in the media over a remark
made by the German Minister of Justice, Herta
Daeubler-Gmelin. She was addressing a convention
of trade unionists (try to imagine the US
counterpart, John Ashcroft, talking to a union
convention!), and was talking about whether
George W. was mounting an offensive against
Saddam Hussein in order to distract the public
from his domestic problems. Hardly an outrageous
conspiracy theory - What created the huge flap
is that Daeubler-Gmelin was quoted as saying,
"That's a popular method. Even Hitler did that."
The American media promptly started howling that
she was comparing the sainted President to Adolf
Hitler. - So when a recent member of the cabinet
for Tony Blair came out and flat out accused the
President of the United States of being
complicit in the murders of 3,000 people, and of
treason against his country, the American media
must have gone right out of its mind with
self-righteous rage, right? Wrong.
Why isn't the truth
out there? -
The willingness of journalists to accepts the
establishment's view of the events of, and
after, 9/11 is truly staggering, says Paul
Donovan - One of the major weaknesses of
journalism today is how easily some are seduced
by power. The premier role of the journalist
should be as a check on power, however, many
seem to turn this dictum on its head and get
greater job satisfaction as parrots of the
official truth.
Are the News Media
Soft on Bush?
- That much-ballyhooed “liberal press” hasn’t
been nearly as tough on President Bush as it was
on his predecessor. One key reason: Bush’s
controversies have involved policy rather than
personal peccadilloes, and the media have a much
bigger appetite for the latter. But does the
weapons of mass destruction flap presage a
shift?
ACTION ALERT: -
"Bush's Way" Unchallenged in U.S. News & World
Report -
The cover of the November 17 U.S. News & World
Report reads: "Bush's Way: The Promise and Peril
of Seeing the World in Black and White." But the
article inside provides an evaluation of the
Bush administration's foreign policy that relies
primarily on the Bush administration itself, to
the exclusion of Bush critics.
- TVNL
Comment: This is called an infomercial!
Media's silence speaks
clearly about their loyalties - The
Washington press corps apparently
decided that respecting one journalist's dubious
secrecy pledge outweighed
any professional dutyto
get to the bottom of a nasty, and potentially
explosive, instance of deceit and reprisal.
Tide turning on Bush
flashdance -
U.S. editorialists seek probe into war -
Yesterday afternoon at 1, CNN's
Kyra Phillips gave
us the headlines, and then paused
dramatically, "First, the story everybody's
talking about today ..." -
A news junkie could be forgiven for expecting
the lead item to be how U.S. President George W.
Bush's approval ratings are 49 per cent, an
all-time low. It is now undeniable that the
White House misled the country into war. It
is so under the gun that, yesterday, Bush
announced an "independent" panel to examine the
false — falsified, surely — intelligence that
hurled his nation into the Iraqi quagmire and a
fiscal nightmare. - But
no. Instead Janet Jackson's nipple jewelry was
flashdanced again,
as if hundreds of millions of people hadn't
already caught her Super Bowl boob job over and
over again. - Now it's up
to the media to hold the administration's feet
to the fire and
emphasize that, if Bush himself is "putting
together a independent bipartisan commission" —
which he is — then it won't be so independent. - The
media must also remind citizens that the White
House has consistently undermined the 9/11
Independent Commission,
which is investigating the tragedy that Bush
used to justify later foreign aggressions. -
Last year, the U.S.
media acted as Bush's cheerleaders and
half-time entertainment.
Murdoch brings in Bush
adviser -
The US national security adviser Condoleezza
Rice is to address the News Corporation
thinktank involving Rupert Murdoch's most senior
newspaper executives from the UK, US and
Australia. - She will will deliver her speech by
satellite at the invitation of Mr Murdoch's Fox
operation, which includes Fox News which has
been hugely supportive of George Bush and
achieved notoriety in the UK during the Iraq war
for its ultra-patriotic reporting. - Mr
Murdoch's News Corp summits are seen as key
opportunities to influence the political bias of
his news outfits.
Smear Without Fear -
In short, CNN passed along a smear that it
attributed to the White House. When the smear
backfired, it declared its previous statements
inoperative and said the White House wasn't
responsible. Sound familiar? - But if unnamed
"administration officials" spread rumors about
administration critics, reporters have an
obligation to check the facts before giving
those rumors national exposure. And there's no
excuse for disseminating unchecked rumors
because they come from "the White House," then
denying the White House connection when the
rumors prove false. That's simply giving the
administration a license to smear with
impunity.
Why didn't America's
top journalists grill Bush on Iraq War? -
Allowing President George W. Bush to duck hard
questions and not demanding the difficult
answers, American reporters failed to support
our troops in Iraq whose causality numbers
increase, day by day. They similarly failed our
nation, waiting for answers about a war that
could have been avoided. - TVNL Comment: The
obvious answer...they are NOT America’s TOP
journalists. They are America’s CORPORATE
journalists.
NBC Blocking Use of
Bush TV Footage for Film Critical of War in Iraq -
NBC is using its copyright protection to deny an
award-winning filmmaker access to film of a
recent appearance by President Bush on "Meet the
Press," possibly because the network is trying
to protect the President politically, a Stanford
Law professor said today. - The footage was
requested by film director and producer Robert
Greenwald, who last year produced an
award-winning documentary about the Iraq War, "Uncovered,"
in which CIA, Pentagon and foreign service
experts detailed the lies, misstatements and
exaggerations by the Bush Administration that
led to the U.S. invasion more than a year ago.
Google kills ad
critical of Bush, lets pro-Bush ads continue
running -
Advertisements promoting pro-Bush playing cards
continue to run on Google and its affiliate
sites, including George Bush Playing Cards, "52
Reasons to Re-elect G.W. Bush," and "Political
Playing Cards." Another ad appears for a tamer
site selling caricature cards of the President's
associates, saying, "George Bush may not have a
full deck."
Beware of
Media-Assisted Republican Dirty Tricks -
Republican dirty tricks helped by media
complicity let George W. Bush steal the election
from Al Gore in 2000. Data from the journalism
resource service, Nexus-Lexus, strongly suggest
that if the mainstream media had covered George
Bush’s actual lies with the same frequency and
depth that they carried the RNC lies
manufactured to discredit Al Gore, then Gore
would have won by a landslide. Never
underestimate the power of Republican dirty
tricks.
Stewart gets serious,
why won't reporters? -
U.S. journalists keep kid gloves on - Do not
adjust your set: U.S. TV journalists are finally
asking politicians the tough questions they
should have been posing in the run-up to the
attack on Iraq. - Trouble is, more often than
not, they're asking those questions of
Democrats. - Meanwhile, newscasters act as
stenographers, as if publishing what each side
says — or at least edited bits of what they say
— serves the public, let alone the truth. Since
when is journalism tape recording? - The Bush
administration continues to massacre the truth
with almost no contradiction from the media.
All the President's
Spin -
The Bush White House’s philosophy that the media
serve no particular democratic function guides
its relationship with journalists. Because it
sees them as a hostile force in search of the
next headline, the administration has no
reservations about employing an arsenal of
public relations and news management tools to
try to shape coverage. These include half-truths
and strategically ambiguous language that are
difficult for “objective” reporters to expose,
relentless message discipline, restrictions on
press interaction with Bush, direct pressure on
journalists, and dishonesty about policy issues
that the media find boring. By wielding these
tactics against reporters reluctant to criticize
the President after Sept. 11, Bush was able to
neuter the press corps for most of his first
three years in office.
CHARADE -
Journalists have had Bush dead to rights several
times, including catching him in multiple lies
about his association with Enron and his whopper
for the ages regarding weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq. Repeatedly, reporters have
served the financial ends of the media
conglomerates by letting Bush off the hook.
There has been a seemingly improbable series of
blunders, the most outrageous of which was the
“misinterpretation” of the data from the major
media’s own Consortium study that confirmed Bush
had stolen the 2000 election but was reported to
the public as proving exactly the opposite.
Media Lies About
"Initial" Bush Tsunami Aid Package -
The amount of money the Bush administration
initially pledged to the relief effort in
Southeast Asia seems to change by the day on Fox
News as well as on other "news" outlets. By
changing the amount, the press is not only lying
to the public, but giving the Bush
administration a very, very BIG break as has
been so frighteningly common over the last few
years.
A televisual fairyland -
The US media is disciplined by corporate America
into promoting the Republican cause - How did a
fantasy president from a world of make believe
come to govern a country whose power was built
on hard-headed materialism?
Check your media lap
dogs, Mr. President -
If America's mainstream media really were as
liberal as conservatives claim we are, we would
be ballyhooing the fiasco of James D. Guckert,
a.k.a. Jeff Gannon, with Page 1 banner headlines
and hourly bulletins. - Imagine, then, how the
conservative choir would sing out at this point
if a Democratic White House knocked long-tenured
journalists off its press room access lists so
that it could give access to a fellow like
Guckert, 47, who dependably asks softball
questions because he reports for a partisan Web
site that supports the Bush administration.
BuzzFlash Vs. The New
York Times -
In a David vs. Goliath battle, we think
BuzzFlash is holding its own. For one thing, the
New York Times is starting to get a little
defensive at our criticisms of their roll over
and play dead coverage of the White House.
http://tvnewslies.org/html/lapdog_press.html
|